A person seen from behind in a bright living room, mid forehand swing with an empty hand in front of a large television
tenniskinect

WHAT THE RESEARCH SAYS

A swing in the lounge
is not a set on court.

3–6 METs for short bouts of play

AI-generated image, not a photograph of a real person or place.

Motion games get you off the sofa. How far they go is another question.

Studies measuring young players found active video games use clearly more energy than sitting games, and short bouts can reach moderate intensity. A 2007 study still found they fell short of the real sport.

Compare the effort

THE SHORT ANSWER

Better than sitting,
short of the court.

Researchers measure effort in METs,
where 1 MET is about sitting quietly.

VS SITTING

Clearly more energy

A 2007 BMJ study of 11 teenagers found motion-controlled bowling, tennis and boxing all used significantly more energy than a seated game.

See the numbers

VS THE COURT

Not the real sport

The same study concluded active games used not as much energy as playing the sport itself. The Compendium lists singles tennis at 8.0 METs.

Compare the effort

OVER TIME

Short bursts, small change

A 2024 review found short bouts reached 3 to 6 METs, but programmes of six weeks or more showed no significant effect on activity levels.

Read the review
Trainers and a water bottle on a living room rug, with a sofa pushed back to clear space for moving
AI-generated image, not a photograph of a real person or place.

READING A STUDY LIKE THIS

Four things
worth checking.

Headlines about games and exercise often squeeze a lot into one line. These are the questions the studies themselves raise.

  1. Compared with what?

    The BMJ study compared active games with a seated game, not with the sport. Both comparisons appear in its conclusions.

  2. How many players?

    That study measured 11 teenagers in a laboratory, playing each game for 15 minutes.

  3. Short bout or long run?

    The 2024 review found short bouts reached moderate intensity, but programmes of six weeks or more showed no significant effect.

  4. Which measure?

    METs compare effort with sitting quietly. Studies differ in methods, which the review says limits comparing results.

TWO NUMBERS WORTH KNOWING

The screen helps,
the court helps more.

One figure for game play,
one for the real thing.

3–6 METs

Typical effort in short bouts of play

A systematic review of 23 studies in young people found short-term active video games reached moderate intensity, mostly with sports and dance games. Longer programmes showed no significant change.

ACTIVE GAMES · SPORTS (2024)

8.0 METs

Singles tennis on court

The 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities lists singles tennis at 8.0 METs, doubles at 4.5 to 6.0 and general moderate-effort tennis at 6.8.

REAL TENNIS · COMPENDIUM

In the 2007 BMJ study, predicted energy use was 202.5 kJ/kg/min for motion-controlled tennis against 125.5 for a seated game, measured in six boys and five girls aged 13 to 15 who played each game for 15 minutes.

AN EFFORT CHECK

How hard is
each kind of tennis?

Pick an activity to see its typical effort in METs, the standard unit researchers use. The bar shows how intense it is compared with the others.

Values for real tennis come from the 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities. The active video game range comes from a 2024 systematic review of studies in young people. This is general information, not personal health advice.

Effort check

Choose an activity
Sitting quietly1 MET

One MET is defined as roughly the energy cost of sitting quietly. Every other value is a multiple of this resting level.

Motion-controlled games, short bouts3–6 METs

A 2024 systematic review of 23 studies found short-term active video game play gave energy use comparable to moderate-intensity activity.

Hitting balls, no match5.0 METs

The Compendium lists hitting balls in non-game play at moderate effort at 5.0 METs.

Doubles tennis4.5–6.0 METs

The Compendium has two doubles entries, at 4.5 and 6.0 METs. The NHS lists doubles tennis as a moderate-intensity activity for adults.

Singles tennis8.0 METs

Singles tennis is listed at 8.0 METs, the same as competitive general tennis.

Sources: 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities (sports codes 15675 to 15695 and the MET definition); Sports (2024) 12(2):39 systematic review; NHS physical activity guidelines for adults.

A green outdoor hard tennis court in morning light, with a racket and three yellow balls resting by the net
AI-generated image, not a photograph of a real person or place.

WHERE THE GUIDELINES COME IN

Moderate means
talk, but not sing.

The NHS says moderate activity raises your heart rate and makes you breathe faster and feel warmer; one test is that you can still talk but not sing. It asks children and young people aged 5 to 18 to average at least 60 minutes of moderate or vigorous activity a day.

For adults aged 19 to 64, the NHS guideline is at least 150 minutes of moderate or 75 minutes of vigorous activity a week, plus strengthening on 2 days. The 2007 study authors judged the games they tested not intense enough to count towards children's daily recommendation.

In conversation

Questions people ask

Do motion-controlled games count as exercise?

They use more energy than sitting games. A 2024 review found short bouts reached moderate intensity, 3 to 6 METs, but a 2007 BMJ study found the games it tested used less energy than the real sport.

What is a MET?

A metabolic equivalent. The Compendium of Physical Activities defines 1 MET as roughly the energy cost of sitting quietly, so an activity at 6 METs uses about six times that resting rate.

How energetic is real tennis?

The 2024 Adult Compendium lists singles tennis at 8.0 METs, doubles at 4.5 to 6.0, general moderate-effort tennis at 6.8 and hitting balls outside a match at 5.0.

Did playing active games for weeks change activity levels?

The 2024 systematic review found that in programmes lasting at least six weeks there were no significant effects on young people's energy expenditure or activity profiles between the start and follow-up.

How much activity do the NHS guidelines suggest?

For ages 5 to 18, an average of at least 60 minutes of moderate or vigorous activity a day. For adults 19 to 64, at least 150 minutes of moderate or 75 minutes of vigorous activity a week, plus strengthening on 2 days.

Sources

Each figure on this page comes from the sources below.

  1. Graves et al. (2007), BMJ: Comparison of energy expenditure in adolescents when playing new generation and sedentary computer games
  2. Sports (2024): Estimated energy expenditure in youth while playing active video games, a systematic review
  3. 2024 Compendium of Physical Activities: Sports (MET values)
  4. Compendium of Physical Activities: About and MET definition
  5. NHS: Physical activity guidelines for children and young people
  6. NHS: Physical activity guidelines for adults aged 19 to 64

ABOUT THIS NAME

Interested in leasing tenniskinect.com?

tenniskinect.com is part of the DoodleSale portfolio. It isn't in an auction right now, but you can ask about leasing it.

Ask about this name